O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E OS ATOS INTERNA CORPORIS DO SENADO NO PROCESSO DE IMPEACHMENT: UMA ANÁLISE DO ATIVISMO JUDICIAL NO MS. 34.441/DF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2017.48.265-286Abstract
O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar a decisão monocrática na Medida Cautelar em Mandado de Segurança nº 34.441/DF de relatoria do Ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal Teori Zavascki com base na Crítica Hermenêutica do Direito. Partindo do método hermenêutico, realizamos uma pesquisa bibliográfica e documental sobre o tema para coletar a referida decisão monocrática. Concluímos que a decisão monocrática do ministro Teori Zavascki foi tomada por um ato de vontade do julgador, que decidiu com base em argumentos políticos e não jurídicos, o que viola os pressupostos democráticos instituídos pela Constituição de 1988 e que os atos interna corporis do Senado Federal editados no processo de impeachment, como atos administrativos, podem ser apreciados pela jurisdição constitucional se violarem preceitos constitucionais.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:
Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notices:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.
References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.
