A self-perception of ageism among elderly individuals during the covid-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.15784Palabras clave:
Aging, discrimination, ageismResumen
The objective of the study was to analyze the self-perception of elderly individuals regarding ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Amazonas state. A quantitative and qualitative study was conducted in Manaus, AM, with a sample population of 44 elderly individuals aged ≥ 60 years, of both sexes, who were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to May 2023. The study was divided into two stages. The first stage consisted of a quantitative study, of the observational epidemiological type, cross-sectional, in which information was collected through the application of a Likert-type ageism self-perception scale. The second stage consisted of a qualitative study composed of two open-ended questions related to experiences of ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic by the research participants, who were interviewed in structured interviews, with 10 volunteers in total, representing a percentage of 20% of the participants. The results showed that 75% of the respondents experienced two or more situations of ageism. They self-reported two or more types of ageism compared to those who did not report ageism or reported only one type of ageism. In the qualitative analysis, mesostructural and macrostructural ageism, predominantly of explicit origin, were observed. We concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic increased instances of ageism experienced by elderly individuals in Manaus, particularly noting that this discrimination occurred among healthcare professionals and public transportation drivers. We acknowledge the study's sample size limitation and its focus on a specific elderly population. However, it is extremely important to establish strategies to combat ageism through strengthening and updating policies and laws, as well as educational and research interventions.
Citas
1- Naveca FG, Nascimento V, De Souza VC, et al. COVID-19 in Amazonas, Brazil, was driven by the persistence of endemic lineages and emergence of P.1. Nat Med. 2021;27:1230-1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01378-7. Acesso em: 09 mar. 2023.
2- Malta DC, et al. Social distancing, feelings of sadness and lifestyles of the Brazilian population during the Covid-19 pandemic. Health in Debate. 2020;44(spe4):177–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042020E411.
3- Donizzetti AR, Lagacé M. COVID-19 and Mental Illness in the Elderly: The Role of Risk Perception, Social Isolation, Loneliness and Ageism. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4513. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084513.
4- Nikolich-Zugich J, Knox KS, Rios CT, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in the elderly: what we can expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses and outcomes. GeroScience. 2020;42:505–514. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-020-00186-0.
5- Manso M, et al. Ageismo e COVID-19: uma revisão integrativa. Invest Soc Desenv. 2021;10(11):e274101119233. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19233. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2023.
6- Pan American Health Organization. World Report on Ageism. Washington, D.C. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2022. DOI: 10.37774/9789275724453. Acesso em: 20 maio 2023.
7- Minó NM, Mello RMADV. Representation of old age: reflections on stereotypes, prejudice and stigmatization of the elderly. Oikos. 2021;32(1):273-298. DOI: 10.31423/oikos.v32i1.9889. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2023.
8- Minayo MC de, Costa AP. Theoretical Foundations of Qualitative Research Techniques. Rev. Lusófona de Educação. 2018;40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle40.01.
9- Palmore E. The Ageism Survey: First Findings. Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):572–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572.
10- Ferreira-Alves J, Novo RF. Assessment of social discrimination against elderly people in Portugal. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2006;6:65-77.
11- Couto MC de P, et al. Assessment of discrimination against the elderly in the Brazilian context - ageism. Psychol Theory Res. 2009;25(4):509-518.
12- Vilela RB, Ribeiro A, Batista NA. Word cloud as a content analysis tool: An application to the challenges of the professional master's degree in health education. Millenium. 2017;2(11):29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0211.03.00230.
13- Ayalon L, Cohn-Schwartz E. Measures of self-and other-directed ageism and worries concerning COVID-19 health consequences: Results from a nationally representative sample of Israelis over the age of 50. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251577.
14- Fernández-Ballesteros R, Sánchez-Izquierdo M. Health, psychosocial factors and ageism in older people in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health. 2021;9(3):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030256.
15- D'cruz M, Banerjee D. An invisible human rights crisis’: The marginalization of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic – An advocacy review. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292:113369.
16- Rueda J. Ageism in the COVID-19 pandemic: Age-based discrimination in screening decisions and beyond. HPLS. 2021;43:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00441-3.
17- Abrahão Faiad De Moura A, Rezende Freitas E. Agerism In Urban Public Transport: A Reality? Interdiscip Stud Aging. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.132273.
18- Azambuja Rm Da M, Ramos Mn, Ramos Mcp. Grandparents and Cultures: Intergenerational relationships and experiences in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Res Soc Dev. 2023;12(3):e27312340631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i3.40631.
19- Soares TS, Corradi-Perini C, Macedo CPL De, Ribeiro URVC. Covid-19 and ageism: ethical assessment of the distribution of health resources. Bioethics. 2021;29(2):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422021292461
20- Martinelli M, Rueda FJM. The influence of subjective well-being on quality of life in the elderly. Psicol Am Lat. 2020;34:183-193.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Contexto & Saúde
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Ao publicar na Revista Contexto & Saúde, os autores concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os trabalhos seguem a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), que permite:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato;
Adaptar — remixar, transformar e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, inclusive comercial.
Essas permissões são irrevogáveis, desde que respeitados os seguintes termos:
Atribuição — os autores devem ser devidamente creditados, com link para a licença e indicação de eventuais alterações realizadas.
Sem restrições adicionais — não podem ser aplicadas condições legais ou tecnológicas que restrinjam o uso permitido pela licença.
Avisos:
A licença não se aplica a elementos em domínio público ou cobertos por exceções legais.
A licença não garante todos os direitos necessários para usos específicos (ex.: direitos de imagem, privacidade ou morais).
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões expressas nos artigos, que são de exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores. O Editor, com o apoio do Comitê Editorial, reserva-se o direito de sugerir ou solicitar modificações quando necessário.
Somente serão aceitos artigos científicos originais, com resultados de pesquisas de interesse que não tenham sido publicados nem submetidos simultaneamente a outro periódico com o mesmo objetivo.
A menção a marcas comerciais ou produtos específicos destina-se apenas à identificação, sem qualquer vínculo promocional por parte dos autores ou da revista.
Contrato de Licença (para artigos publicados a partir de setembro/2025): Os autores mantém os direitos autorais sobre seu artigo, e concedem à Revista Contexto & Saúde o direito de primeira publicação.
