DA RELATIVIZAÇÃO ANÔMALA DA COISA JULGADA COM A SUPERAÇÃO DO PRECEDENTE JUDICIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2019.52.195-209Abstract
This is a study about the possibility of the atypical relativization of the thing judged when the constraints in fact were ignored in order to overcome the precedent. With the validity of the CPC/2015, the presence of the system of precedents (stare decisis) in Brazilian law has become clearer as a way to guarantee the stability of judicial decisions. However, the renewal of the consolidated understanding, although apparent to be unfavorable to the stability of the precedent, is also a way to preserve the expectation of the particular. It occurs that sometimes the precedent is overcome without being in disagreement with the social reality, in other words, without observance of the constraints in fact, assumptions that legitimize the renewal of understanding. The problem arises when the decision tainted by this addiction transits into trial and becomes immutable ad eternum, in view of the lack of legal prediction that authorizes its disconstitution. The present work intends, from a sufficient exposition to the comprehension of the theme, to answer the following question: There is a possibility to revise the thing judged through the rescisential action when the sentence or judgment is based solely on a Judicial precedent overcome without observance of the constraints in fact?
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:
Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notices:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.
References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.








