OLDER CONSUMER HYPERVULNERABILITY IN CONTRAPPOINT TO THE INCREASE OF THE EXPENSES OF THE HEALTH PLANS IN RESPONSE OF THE AGE, SINCE THE REPETITIVE SPECIAL APPEAL JUDGMENT (REsp 1,568,244 / RJ) BY STJ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2019.51.34-48Keywords:
Consumer law. Hypervulnerability of the elderly. Health insurance. REsp 1.568.244 / RJ. Superior Justice Tribunal.Abstract
This article, through the deductive method and theoretical and jurisprudential research, intends to demonstrate that the decision of the Superior Court of Justice, in the judgment of repetitive theme 952 and based on REsp 1,568,244 / RJ, under the pretext of standardizing judicial interpretation about the abusive readjustments in the health plans of the elderly, seriously impinged on consumer protection, in that it overvalued the old principle of pacta sunt servanda in consumer relations and also attributed decision-making authority to the National Consumer Protection Agency. Health in relation to the readjustment of the monthly payments, leaving to an improbable judicial review the concept of excessive onerousness in the analysis of the concrete case. It is concluded that the previous reference ignores the condition of hypervulnerability of the elderly consumer, favoring the transfer of the risk of the economic activity of the Plan Administrators to the weaker part in the consumption relation, compromising the own access to health.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:
Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notices:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.
References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.








