The reasoning of judicial decisions in the civil procedure code: an analysis in Castanheira Neves about the importance of concrete cases in realizing law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2024.61.13865

Keywords:

Castanheira Neves, judicial decision, interpretation

Abstract

This paper analyzes if the article 489, § 1, of the brazilian Civil Procedure Code, is compatible with the doctrine of Castanheira Neves. Try to find out if the lessons of the referenced author can assist in the application of the article 489. It verifies how judges of Brazilian Courts are evaluating the application of the mentioned legal provision.

References

ALEXY, Robert. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. 2. ed. Tradução Virgílio Afonso da Silva. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2017.

ALVIM, Teresa Arruda. Nulidades do processo e da sentença. 8. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2017.

BOBBIO, Norberto. O positivismo jurídico: lições de filosofia do direito. São Paulo: Ícone, 1999.

CASTANHEIRA NEVES, António. A distinção entre a questão-de-facto e a questão-de-direito. In: CASTANHEIRA NEVES, António. Digesta: escritos acerca do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1995. Vol. 1.

CASTANHEIRA NEVES, António. O actual problema metodológico da interpretação jurídica – I. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2003.

CASTANHEIRA NEVES, António. Metodologia jurídica – problemas fundamentais. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1993.

DIDIER JR., Fredie; OLIVEIRA, Rafael Alexandria de; BRAGA, Paula Sarno. In: CABRAL, Antonio do Passo; CRAMER, Ronaldo (coord.). Comentários ao Novo Código de Processo Civil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2015. p. 704-744.

MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz; MITIDIERO, Daniel. O novo processo civil. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.

MONTENEGRO FILHO, Misael. Novo código de processo civil comentado. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

NERY JUNIOR, Nelson; NERY, Rosa Maria de Andrade. Código de processo civil comentado. 16. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.

NERY JUNIOR, Nelson. Princípios do processo na Constituição Federal. 12. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.

TORRES, Artur. Sentença, coisa julgada e recursos cíveis codificados: de acordo com as leis 13.105/2015 e 13.256/2016. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2017.

WAMBIER, Teresa Arruda Alvim. Sentença. In: WAMBIER, Teresa Arruda Alvim; WAMBIER, Luiz Rodrigues (coord.). Temas essenciais do novo CPC: análise das principais alterações do sistema processual civil brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2016. p. 373-391.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-03

How to Cite

Bezerra, V., & Bedê, A. . (2024). The reasoning of judicial decisions in the civil procedure code: an analysis in Castanheira Neves about the importance of concrete cases in realizing law. Revista Direito Em Debate, 33(61), e13865. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2024.61.13865

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 61 (2024): Revista Direito em Debate

Section

ARTICLES

License

By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:

Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.

These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:

Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;

No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.

Notices:

The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.

References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.

License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.