DESENVOLVIMENTO x RESERVA DO POSSÍVEL NO CENÁRIO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO BRASILEIRO: O CASO DOS REFUGIADOS VENEZUELANOS

DEVELOPMENT VS. POSSIBLE RESERVE IN THE SCENARIO OF THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC STATE: THE CASE OF VENEZUELAN REFUGEES

Authors

  • Thaise Roberta Colares Leal UNIVERSIDADE DA AMAZÔNIA
  • Antonio José Mattos Neto Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2021.56.10309

Keywords:

Fundamental social rights, Refugees, Minimum existential, Reserving the possible, Democratic State of Law

Abstract

This article aims to present reflections on the realization of the fundamental social rights that make up the minimum existential for foreigners in a situation of refuge, considering, in addition to the Brazilian legal framework, the initial position of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) in the Original Civil Action that is aimed at the entry of Venezuelans in Brazil, a process that is still ongoing. The deductive method was used, based on bibliographic and jurisprudential research. It is concluded that the fundamental social rights guaranteed to refugees in Law 9.474, on 07/22/1997, must be realized concretely, not involving the argument of reserving the possible for their non-compliance, in the environment of the Democratic State of Law.

Author Biographies

Thaise Roberta Colares Leal, UNIVERSIDADE DA AMAZÔNIA

Bacharel em Relações Internacionais; Especialista em Direito Internacional; Mestranda em Direitos Fundamentais da Universidade da Amazônia (PPGDF/UNAMA); Bolsista PROSUP/CAPES.

Antonio José Mattos Neto, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)

Graduado em Direito (UFPA); Doutor em Direito (USP); Especialista em Direito Privado (UFPA); Professor Titular da Universidade Federal do Pará e da Universidade da Amazônia (UNAMA); Procurador da Fazenda Nacional aposentado.

 

Downloads

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

Leal, T. R. C., & Mattos Neto, A. J. (2021). DESENVOLVIMENTO x RESERVA DO POSSÍVEL NO CENÁRIO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO BRASILEIRO: O CASO DOS REFUGIADOS VENEZUELANOS: DEVELOPMENT VS. POSSIBLE RESERVE IN THE SCENARIO OF THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC STATE: THE CASE OF VENEZUELAN REFUGEES. Revista Direito Em Debate, 30(56), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2021.56.10309

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 56 (2021): Revista Direito em Debate

Section

ARTICLES

License

By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:

Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.

These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:

Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;

No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.

Notices:

The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.

References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.

License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.