Systemic thinking and systemic law from the work of Sami Storch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2317-5389.2023.21.13702Keywords:
Paradigma. Pensamento Cartesiano. Pensamento Sistêmico. Ciência tradicional. Direito Sistêmico.Abstract
By stating that "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts," Aristotle succinctly and directly exposed the foundation currently used by defenders of systemic thinking, who recognize the complexity of societies and, consequently, social conflicts and experiences. They propose the emergence of a new scientific paradigm. The emergence of this new way of thinking is in response to the recognition that Law, as a science, has not been able to create effective solutions for the treatment and resolution of various conflicts through the application of the traditional scientific method, which understands the phenomenon as being simple, objective, and stable. This postulation has sparked the need for academic debate on this new method of thinking, which, by understanding conflict in a complex way, aims to solve disputes in order to achieve balance and peace within the now considered complex system. It is from the premise that one cannot have a clear vision without knowing the whole and without taking into account its various interactions, that we affirm our understanding that a revolution in the Cartesian scientific method is necessary because science no longer supports an understanding based on standards or parameters of right or wrong, true or false, as such positions directly result in the loss of space in the face of the various possibilities arising from the complexity of systems.
References
AGUIAR, Ana Cecília Bezerra de et al. Direito sistêmico: o despertar para uma nova consciência jurídica. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2018.
BRASIL. Constituição 1988. 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm. Acesso em: 26 maio 2021.
BRASIL. Resolução nº 125, de 29 de novembro de 2010. Política Judiciária Nacional de tratamento adequado dos conflitos de interesses no âmbito do Poder Judiciário, e dá outras providências.
CAPRA, Fritjof. A revolução ecojurídica: o direito sistêmico em sintonia com a natureza e a comunidade. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2018.
DESCARTES, René. Discurso do método. Tradução Ciro Mioranza. São Paulo: Lafonte, 2017.
DESCARTES, René. Discurso do método. Tradução Maria Ermantina Galvão. São Paulo: Fontes, 1996.
KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1998.
LINCOLN, Yvonna Sessions; GUBA, Egon G. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In Norman Kent Denzin & Yvonna Sessions Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd. Editi., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 2000.
MPPR. Círculos restaurativos auxiliam na solução de disputas familiares. 2018. Disponível em: https://mppr.mp.br/2018/01/19907,10/Circulos-restaurativos-auxiliam-na-solucao-de-disputas-familiares.html. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2021.
PORTUGAL. Carta da transdisciplinaridade. 1994. Disponível em: http://www.gthidro.ufsc.br/arquivos/CARTA-DA-TRANSDISCIPLINARIDADE.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
REALE, Miguel. Lições preliminares de Direito. 27. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2002.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. A crítica da razão indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.
STORCH, Sami. A origem do direito sistêmico: pioneiro do movimento de transformação da Justiça com as Constelações Familiares. Brasília, DF: Tagore, 2020.
STORCH, Sami. Direito sistêmico: a resolução de conflitos por meio da abordagem sistêmica fenomenológica das constelações familiares. 2014. Disponível em: https://direitosistemico.wordpress.com/2017/09/22/artigo-descreve-modelo-original-de-pratica-de-constelacoes-na-justica-e-aplicabilidade-do-direito-sistemico/. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2020.
STORCH, Sami; DE ANDRADE, Roberta Rotta Messias; DA ROSA, Amilton Plácido; DA CUNHA, Karla. (Org.). Estudos de Direito Sistêmico – Volume 1. Brasília: Tagore Editora, 2022.
VASCONCELLOS, Maria José Esteves de. Pensamento sistêmico: o novo paradigma da ciência. 11. ed. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia agree to the following terms:
The works published in Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia follow the license for journals and research in all environments, whether commercial or non-commercial, that make up the international scientific communication system. The journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The editorial team authorizes free access and wide distribution of the published content, provided that the source is cited, i.e., credit is given to the authors and Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, and the text is preserved in its entirety. Authors are allowed to deposit pre-print and post-print versions in institutional or thematic repositories or on their personal webpage (website, blog), as long as it is open access and without any embargo period.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
