Submissions

Author Guidelines

^{1. General Submission Instructions; 2. Language of the Article; 3. Manuscript Structure; 4. Manuscript Formatting; 5. Cover Letter for the Article; 6. General Information about Authorship / CRediT Taxonomy; 7. Considerations Regarding the Use of Chatbots in Submitted Manuscripts; 8. Editorial Process; 8. 1. Stages of the Editorial Process; 8. 2. Quality Control of the Editorial Process; 9. Guidelines for Reviewers and Article Evaluation Criteria; 10. Publication; 10. 1.Timeframe for Publication; 10. 2. Pre-Proof Publication; 10. 3. Open Access Statement; 10. 4. Copyright and Intellectual Property; 10. 5. e-location; 10. 6. Publication Fees}

ARTICLE COVER LATTER

CRediT taxonomy

1. General Submission Instructions

To submit a manuscript, the corresponding author must register in the Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia system. If already registered, simply log in with your username. For access issues, contact: revistaeletronicas@unijui.edu.br.

The journal accepts original, unpublished articles written in Spanish, Portuguese, or English, with a focus on the critical and interdisciplinary study of Human Rights.

Submitted manuscripts must not have been previously submitted to other publications (print or electronic). Contributions must be original, unpublished, and not under simultaneous evaluation by another journal or published in conference proceedings.

At the beginning of the submission, the author must agree to the Submission Conditions – Manuscript Submission Requirements and the terms of the Copyright Declaration (see item 1).

During submission, the corresponding author must provide under Item 2 (Manuscript Transfer):

The manuscript formatted according to the journal’s guidelines.

Cover Letter for the manuscript (see attached template).

Then, under Item 3 (Insert Metadata), the corresponding author must fill in the requested information, including ORCID, email, institution, and a brief biography for each author.

2. Article Language

The Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia accepts manuscripts in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Authors must ensure that the manuscript is properly written in the chosen language to guarantee clarity, grammatical accuracy, and effective scientific communication.

3. Manuscript Structure

Title: Should identify the content of the work in up to 15 words. Present the title in the language of the manuscript and also in English.

Abstract: Up to 250 words, written as a single paragraph. The abstract must be in the manuscript’s language and accompanied by its English version. It should briefly indicate the study’s objective, methodology, main results, and key conclusions.

Keywords: Include 3 to 5 keywords that identify the subject of the work, provided in the manuscript’s language (Palavras-chave) and in English (Keywords).

Introduction: Present the research problem, relevance and justification, literature review (pertinence and relevance of the topic), and objectives aligned with the study’s proposal.

Development: The development section should present the methodological foundations, as well as the research results and discussion. It is important to include methodology, results, and discussion (authors may use other headings if deemed more appropriate).

Conclusions (Final Considerations): Highlight the most important findings, considering the study’s objectives and implications for the field.

References: Organize references in alphabetical order according to ABNT rules, including only authors and works cited in the text. Author names should be complete, using et al. only for references with more than three authors. In-text citations should follow the format: (Author’s Last Name, Year) or (Author’s Last Name, Year, Page) when quoting directly.

Figures and Tables: Figures and tables should be inserted in the text in sequential order, numbered according to their citation in the manuscript, with proper captions. If using figures or tables from other sources, cite the original source.

Ethical Aspects: If the study was submitted to an Ethics Committee (CEP/Conep System or other), authors should include this information in the body of the manuscript or in a footnote.

4. Manuscript Formatting

Page Setup: Manuscripts should be typed on A4 paper, with 1.5 line spacing. Margins should be 3 cm top and left, and 2.5 cm bottom and right. Manuscripts must have 15 to 25 pages, including references and appendices. Use Times New Roman, size 12, except for footnotes, which should be size 10. Titles in Portuguese and English (mandatory) should be size 12, uppercase, bold, and centered.

References: In-text citations should follow the format: (Author’s Last Name, Year) or (Author’s Last Name, Year, Page) when quoting directly. Bibliographic references should appear at the end of the manuscript, in alphabetical order according to ABNT rules. Examples:

Book: LAST NAME, First Name(s). Title in italics: subtitle. Edition number (if not first). Place of publication: Publisher, Year.

Book Chapter: LAST NAME, First Name(s) of chapter author(s). Title of chapter. In: LAST NAME, First Name(s) of editor(s). Title of book in italics: subtitle. Edition number (if not first). Place of publication: Publisher, Year. Pages of chapter.

Journal Article: LAST NAME, First Name(s). Title of article. Journal Name in italics, Place of publication, Volume(Issue), page range, Year.

Dissertations and Theses: LAST NAME, First Name. Title in italics. Year. Dissertation (Master’s) or Thesis (Doctorate) – Institution, City, Year.

Internet/Electronic Documents: LAST NAME, First Name. Title in italics. Year. Available at: [URL]. Accessed on: [date].

Tables: Use Word’s table function, with Times New Roman, size 10, and single line spacing. Each piece of data must occupy a separate cell. Tables must include a title at the top and a source at the bottom (e.g., Source: Authors). Identify each column clearly. Internal lines should appear only above and below the header and in the last row of the table.

Figures: Visual representations (charts, drawings, diagrams, flowcharts, photos) should be labeled as “Figure” followed by the corresponding number (e.g., Figure 1, Figure 2). Titles go above the figure, and sources go below (e.g., Source: Authors).

Text Boxes (Quadros): Used for textual (non-numerical) information. Include side borders and internal lines for organization. If sourced from another publication, provide the reference; if created by the authors, note: Source: Prepared by the authors.

Graphs: Must be clear and legible. If sourced externally, provide the reference; if created by authors, note: Source: Prepared by the authors.

Diagrams, Drawings, Flowcharts: Must be clear, legible, and created with appropriate tools. Cite sources when extracted; if created by authors, note: Source: Prepared by the authors.

Photos: Must be high-resolution and clear.

Participant Quotes (Qualitative Research): For qualitative studies, quotes should have a 1.25 cm left indent, no italics, no quotation marks, with participant identification after the period in parentheses. Example: The qualitative research presents participants’ statements. (Suj1)

5. Cover Letter for the Article

At the time of submission, the corresponding author must submit the Article Cover Letter. A template for the letter is attached. The following information is requested:

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR INFORMATION: Name of the corresponding author; institution of the corresponding author; full address of the corresponding author’s institution.

GENERAL ARTICLE INFORMATION: Manuscript title; type of article (dissertation/thesis, project); sources of funding; study contribution.

AUTHOR INFORMATION: Name, institution, city/state, country of each author; Lattes CV (for Brazilian authors) and ORCID; detailed description of each author’s specific contributions (CRediT taxonomy).

Through the cover letter, the authors of the manuscript confirm that:

The manuscript is original, unpublished, and has not been submitted to any other journal, nor will it be, while under consideration by Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia.

The manuscript has not been published in full or in part in any other medium, and it does not substantially resemble any other work by the authors or by third parties.

All data presented in the article are legitimate and authentic.

The authors actively contributed to the conception of this work and take full responsibility for its content. They have not omitted any financial relationships or agreements between the authors and companies that might have an interest in the publication of this article. All individuals who contributed to this study but did not qualify for authorship have been properly acknowledged in the acknowledgments section, with written authorization from the mentioned contributors.

Any conflicts of interest have been disclosed, and any financial support received for this research has been properly reported and acknowledged.

The authors agree to serve as reviewers in the manuscript evaluation process if requested by the journal.

The authors declare that all ethical principles for research involving human subjects were strictly followed, in accordance with CNS Resolution No. 466, December 12, 2012 (Ethics in Research with Human Beings) and CNS Resolution No. 510, April 7, 2016 (Ethics in Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences).

The data presented in the article are not the result of scientific misconduct, including fabrication of data, improper use of third-party material (such as tables, graphs, charts, figures, scales, designs, instruments, questionnaires, methodology validations, or other illustrations), plagiarism, self-plagiarism, or duplicate publication. The authors declare themselves as the sole authors and copyright owners. If the article contains third-party material, they confirm that prior permission for reproduction has been obtained, avoiding any violation of third-party copyrights or intellectual property rights, in accordance with Law No. 9,610/98.

The authors fully agree with the Open Access and Copyright Policy adopted by Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, which uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, including for commercial purposes, as long as proper credit is given to the original creation. Accordingly, the authors grant the journal the right to perform the first publication of this work with proper recognition of authorship.

The authors agree to the pre-proof publication of the article. That is, after acceptance, the article may be published in its unedited form (without review and layout). Once the article undergoes editing and layout by Editora Unijuí, the authors commit to making any modifications requested for the final published version.

6. General Author Information / CRediT Taxonomy

The authors’ names must not appear in the manuscript itself, but only in the submission metadata and in the Article Cover Letter. The submission metadata must include each author’s email, ORCID, institution, and biography. For the institution, up to three hierarchical levels of affiliation may be included, for example: “University, Faculty, and Department/Program.”

The maximum number of authors is limited to three, with exceptions considered only upon appropriate justification for inclusion. Inclusion of authors whose contributions do not meet the established criteria will not be accepted as a reason for authorship. These contributors, however, may be acknowledged in the Acknowledgments section, which is intended to recognize institutions or individuals who supported the research or contributed to the study but did not qualify as authors. At least one of the authors must hold a doctoral degree as the minimum academic qualification.

The participation and contribution of each individual in the development of the work will be carefully evaluated to ensure that only those who meet the authorship criteria are listed as authors. The purpose of this policy is to ensure transparency and proper attribution of credit to those involved in the study, while maintaining the integrity and validity of the academic work.

The detailed description of each author’s specific contributions must be provided in the Article Cover Letter.

CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) is a comprehensive classification framework comprising 14 distinct roles, each representing typical functions performed by collaborators in the creation of academic and scientific works. These roles describe the specific and individual contributions of each author to the research, allowing a detailed representation of their contributions.

The primary purpose of this taxonomy is to promote transparency regarding individual contributions in scientific works, thereby improving systems for attribution, recognition, and accountability. It is important to note that a single contributor may fulfill more than one role in the creation of a work, and CRediT provides a framework to capture this multiplicity of contributions clearly and systematically.

Conceptualization: Idea, formulation, or development of overarching research goals and aims.

Data Curation: Management of activities to annotate (produce metadata), clean, and maintain research data (including software code when necessary for data interpretation) for initial use or later reuse.

Formal Analysis: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.

Funding Acquisition: Securing financial support for the project that led to the publication.

Investigation: Conducting the research and investigation process, specifically performing experiments or collecting data/evidence.

Methodology: Development or creation of methodology, including creation of models.

Project Administration: Responsibility for management and coordination of research planning and execution.

Resources: Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.

Software Development, Implementation, and Testing: Programming, software development, computer program creation, code and algorithm implementation, and testing of components of existing code.

Supervision: Responsibility for oversight and leadership for research planning and execution activities, including external mentoring of the main research team.

Validation: Verification, either as part of the activity or separately, of the replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.

Data Visualization: Preparation, creation, and/or presentation of the published work, specifically the visualization/presentation of data.

Writing – Original Draft: Preparation, creation, and/or presentation of the published work, specifically the writing of the initial draft (including substantial translations).

Writing – Review & Editing: Preparation, creation, and/or presentation of the published work by those involved in the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary, or revision, including pre- or post-publication processes.

Sources:

https://credit.niso.org/ 

https://scielo.readthedocs.io/projects/scielo-publishing-schema/pt_BR/master/narr/taxonomia-credit.html. 

7. Considerations Regarding the Use of Chatbots in Submitted Manuscripts

In order to ensure the integrity and reliability of the conclusions and results presented in scientific manuscripts that employ chatbots, as well as to maintain public trust in the reported findings, Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia adopts specific guidelines regarding the ethical aspects associated with the use of these technologies in scientific manuscripts.

Transparency: Authors must be fully transparent about the use of chatbots in the manuscript preparation process, providing detailed information (name, version, model, and source) on how the technology was used and the contribution of the chatbots to the creation of the text.

Responsibility: Authors must take full responsibility for the work performed by chatbots in their manuscripts, ensuring the accuracy of what is presented and the absence of plagiarism. Additionally, human authors must ensure that no plagiarism occurs in their articles, including text generated by chatbots.

Attribution: Authors must ensure proper attribution of all sources, including material produced by chatbots. Furthermore, they should seek and cite sources that support the statements generated by the chatbots.

Limitations: Authors must discuss the limitations and potential biases of using chatbots in the production of scientific texts, such as their inability to fully understand nuances or ambiguities in language.

Declaration Requirement: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia requires that authors disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by including a declaration at the time of manuscript submission (item 2 – manuscript transfer).

The declaration should include the following information:

"Declaration of the Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process."
"During the preparation of this article, the author(s) used [NAME OF TOOL/SERVICE] for the purpose of [PURPOSE]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and assumes full responsibility for the content of the publication."

It should be noted that this declaration does not apply to the use of basic text revision tools, such as spell checkers, grammar checkers, bibliographic references, and similar tools. If generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in the writing process, the inclusion of this declaration is not mandatory.

8. Editorial Process

The Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia adopts standardized editorial procedures and quality assurance practices at all stages, beginning with the receipt of the manuscript.

8. 1. Stages of the Editorial Process

Pre-analysis: In the first stage, the article is received by the technical team, which checks for compliance with the journal’s guidelines. The manuscript is then reviewed by members of the Editorial Committee, who assess its alignment with the general criteria and editorial policy of the journal. Articles will be rejected at this stage if they: a) are characterized as literature reviews or excerpts from dissertations, theses, projects, or research reports without proper adaptation; b) are excessively descriptive and lack analytical depth; c) do not make a significant contribution to the field of knowledge; or d) fail to comply with the journal’s publication guidelines. Articles rejected at this stage will be archived, and those approved will proceed to the next phase.

Peer Review: Articles are evaluated by at least two specialists in the relevant field, selected from the journal’s pool of ad hoc reviewers who are members of the Scientific Committee/Review Board and affiliated with different Brazilian and international institutions. The evaluation process is double-blind, meaning that both the reviewers’ and authors’ identities remain anonymous. Reviewer reports may, at the editor’s discretion, be published alongside the article. Reviewers assess the article based on the following criteria: clarity of writing and readability; conformity with academic standards; relevance and adequacy of the theoretical and conceptual framework; clarity and alignment of the study object with the journal’s focus and scope; clearly stated objectives consistent across the abstract, introduction, and conclusion; methodological rigor and suitability to the study’s purpose; quality of results presentation and discussion, supported by the theoretical framework; concise and consistent conclusions; and originality and contribution to the field. After completing the descriptive review and submitting it to the journal’s platform, the reviewer must select one of the following recommendations: Accept, Mandatory Revisions, or Reject.

Reviewer Reports: After the peer review process, the editor sends the reviewers’ reports to the corresponding author, indicating aspects that require correction, improvement, or clarification. The author must make the necessary changes within the established deadline.

Author Revision: Upon resubmission, the author must clearly indicate all modifications made to the text and attach a detailed response letter explaining how each suggestion was addressed or, when necessary, justifying any disagreements. This stage is essential to ensure the scientific rigor and editorial quality of the work prior to the final decision.

Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers’ reports and the revised version, the Editors of the journal will communicate the editorial decision regarding acceptance or rejection of the manuscript. If additional adjustments in content or structure are required, these will be indicated to the authors, who must make the necessary changes. The Editors may also suggest minor stylistic or formatting adjustments to align the text with the journal’s editorial standards and visual identity.

Publication of the Pre-proof Version: After acceptance, the journal will publish the accepted version without editorial modifications, marked with a watermark indicating that it is an unedited version, along with the following notice: “This is a preliminary and unedited version of a manuscript that has been accepted for publication in the Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia. As a service to our readers, we are making this initial version available as accepted. The manuscript will still undergo copyediting, formatting, and author approval before final publication.” At this stage, the article will already be assigned a DOI. The editor will later contact the authors regarding publication of the final versions.

Portuguese Language Review: All approved articles undergo a linguistic and reference review. Minor adjustments that do not affect content comprehension may be made by the reviewers.

Layout: The article will then be typeset according to the journal’s final publication format, following its graphic and visual standards.

Proof: The formatted version will be sent to the author for final verification. Only minor linguistic adjustments or small corrections that do not alter the content or structure of the article will be permitted. Any corrections must be communicated within the deadline established by the Editorial Team.

Final Version: After approval of the final proof, the pre-proof version will be replaced by the definitive version on the journal’s website.

8. 2. Quality Control of the Editorial Process

Editorial Quality: The publisher and the Editorial Committee are responsible for ensuring the quality of both the published content and the entire editorial process. Both must strictly adhere to the principles of editorial ethics, following all stages of the editorial workflow and standardizing evaluation criteria. The journal publicly discloses the names of its editors along with their institutional affiliations and ORCID iDs.

Quality of Ad Hoc Reviewers: The selection of ad hoc reviewers is rigorous, aiming to guarantee the quality and impartiality of the evaluations. Reviewers are chosen based on their active engagement and productivity in the manuscript’s thematic area, with recent and recognized experience in the field. Previous review performance is also considered, prioritizing those who have demonstrated commitment to deadlines and quality in their assessments. The journal ensures that reviewers have no conflicts of interest and no recent co-authorship or collaboration with the authors of the manuscript under review. The list of ad hoc reviewers who have performed reviews for the journal is published annually.

Quality of Editorial Decisions: Editorial decisions prioritize the scientific validity of the article and its relevance to the academic community. Editors follow the guidelines of the journal’s editorial board and comply with legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Decisions are based on reports from ad hoc reviewers, considering the scientific merit and quality of the manuscript. The evaluation process is conducted impartially, without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political stance of the authors. The journal employs a double-blind review system, in which both reviewers and authors remain anonymous, aiming to prevent any bias during the evaluation process.

Post-publication Quality: The journal follows an open access model, meaning all articles are made immediately and freely available online upon publication. Anyone can access, read, and examine the full content of the articles without restrictions, promoting transparency and scientific reproducibility.

The journal welcomes comments, questions, and suggestions regarding published articles. Readers may submit a letter to the Editor with their observations.

In cases where potential scientific errors or ethical issues are identified in a published article, the editorial team should be contacted. Upon notification, the necessary procedures will be initiated to investigate the matter. If errors are confirmed, appropriate measures will be taken, such as issuing a correction or formal retraction, in accordance with international ethical guidelines.

9. Guidelines for Reviewers and Article Evaluation Criteria

Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia is committed to promoting the dissemination of relevant and high-quality scientific research in the field of Human Rights. Below are the Peer Review Evaluation Criteria:

Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Does the manuscript strictly follow the formatting and submission guidelines of Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, ensuring standardization and uniformity across publications?

Clarity of the Investigated Problem: Is the research problem clearly formulated and presented, allowing precise understanding of the study’s objectives?

Study Contribution: Is the manuscript relevant and innovative, adding new knowledge to the field of human rights?

National or International Relevance: Does the article present relevance beyond the local context, with the potential to contribute to the national or international human rights research landscape?

Analysis of the Scientific Literature: Is the literature review pertinent and comprehensive, demonstrating familiarity with previously published scientific work related to the study topic?

Appropriateness of the Research Method: Is the research method suitable for addressing the investigated problem, ensuring the reliability and validity of the results?

Clarity and Replicability of the Method: Is the method description clear and detailed, allowing other researchers to replicate the study?

Data Analysis: Is the data analysis conducted clearly, appropriately, and correctly, providing a well-founded interpretation of the results?

Adequate Presentation of Results: Are the results presented clearly, objectively, and appropriately, facilitating reader understanding?

Evidence-Based Discussion and Conclusions: Are the discussion and conclusion(s) supported by the presented results and/or current and relevant literature, providing a consistent argumentation?

Quality of the Text: Is the text clear, coherent, and well-organized, contributing to the dissemination of high-quality scientific knowledge?

By adopting these evaluation criteria, Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia aims to maintain a high standard of excellence in its publications, providing readers and researchers with a reliable source of scientific knowledge in the field of human rights.

10. Publication

10. 1. Time to Publication

The estimated time for the review process is 5 months, with the total time from submission to publication being 9 months.

10. 2. Pre-Proof Publication

After the article is accepted, the journal will publish the accepted version without modifications, with a watermark indicating that it is an unedited version of the article, containing the following information:

"This is a preliminary and unedited version of a manuscript that has been accepted for publication in Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia. As a service to our readers, we are making this initial version available as accepted. The manuscript will still undergo review, formatting, and approval by the authors before it is published in its final form."

At this stage, the publication will already have a DOI assigned. The editor will later contact the authors regarding the publication of the final versions.

10. 3. Open Access Statement

Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia is an open-access publication, which means that all content is freely available without cost to users or their institutions. The journal provides immediate and unrestricted access to its content, in accordance with the principle of disseminating scientific knowledge.

Articles are published under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, as long as proper credit is given to the author(s) and the original source.

In accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access, users are permitted to read, copy, distribute, print, search, link to full texts of articles, or use them for any lawful purpose without prior permission from the publisher or the authors.

The opinions and concepts expressed in the articles are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the journal or its editorial board.

10. 4. Copyright and Intellectual Property

By publishing in Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, authors agree to the following terms:

Articles are published under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:

Share — to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;

Adapt — to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes.

These permissions are irrevocable, provided that the following terms are respected:

Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made;

No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.

Notices:

The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.

The license does not grant all rights necessary for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).

The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed in the articles, which are solely the responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.

Only original scientific articles will be accepted, with research results of interest that have not been published or simultaneously submitted to another journal for the same purpose.

References to trademarks or specific products are for identification purposes only, with no promotional association by the authors or the journal.

License Agreement: Authors retain the copyright to their article and grant Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia the right of first publication.

10. 5. E-Location

Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia adopts the e-location system for each published article. Articles no longer use continuous and sequential page numbers (e.g., 1–15; 16–25) and instead display an electronic identifier called an e-location (e.g., e13264; e13965), which is indicated in the PDF under “how to cite.” The total number of pages of the articles is still included in the PDFs solely to facilitate page count management.

10. 6. Publication Fees

Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia does not charge any fees for submission or peer review.

To ensure the journal’s periodicity, regularity, quality, and open access to published manuscripts, a publication fee of R$ 300.00 is charged for articles accepted for publication. This fee covers the costs of review, formatting, DOI registration, and journal maintenance.

Payment can be made via PayPal after article acceptance or by bank deposit:

^{BANCO DO BRASIL - Ag.: 0371-9 - Cc.: 7458-6 - O código identificador é o CPF do depositante ou CNPJ – FIDENE: 90738014/0001-08}

^{BANRISUL – Ag.: 0220 - Cc.: 2400159201}

^{CAIXA ECONÔMICA FEDERAL – Ag.: 4311 – Operação: 003 – Conta:122-4}

^{SICREDI – Ag.: 0361 – Conta: 8001-2}

^{PIX (CNPJ) – 90.738.014/0001-08}

If payment is made by bank deposit or Pix, the corresponding author must send the proof of payment and the following information for the issuance of an invoice to revistaseletronicas@unijui.edu.br:

^{Full name, CPF (taxpayer identification number), Complete address, Email, Article title, Any other information that should appear on the invoice}

For any questions, please contact the journal at revistaseletronicas@unijui.edu.br

Updated on October 29, 2025.