Non-exercise prediction model to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in brazilian adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2026.51.15412Palavras-chave:
Regression analysis, cardiorespiratory fitness, prediction algorithmsResumo
The most accurate tool to assess cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). However, for its use it is required expensive equipment, trained technicians and considerable time, restricting its use in large population studies. Given these limitations, this study aims to develop and cross-validate a prediction model for estimating CRF in adults using simple resting outcomes. The study used data from 8,526 subjects, aged between 18 and 65 years, consisting of 5,291 men and 3,235 women divided into development group (G1) and cross validation group (G2). To develop models to estimate the CRF, the variables analysed were gender, conditioning, age, pre-exercise heart rate, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and smoking. Using multiple linear regression, a model was developed to estimate oxygen uptake peak (VO2peak) based on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Heart rate Pre-effort (HRpre-esf) conditioning, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and diabetes. This predictive model showed a coefficient correlation (r) = 0.74, and explained 55.5% of the variation of VO2peak, with standard error of estimate (SEE) indicating 6.93 ml.kg-1.min-1 variation. Cross-validation using other subjects confirmed these statistics with correlation of (r) = 0.75, adjusted R2 of 0.56, and SEE of 6.11 ml.kg. -1min-1. The model developed to predict CRF is feasible and practical for prediction of VO2peak in epidemiological studies or when a CPET cannot be performed. These models, which do not involve physical exercise, can serve as a tool to guide exercise prescription strategies.
Referências
1. Raghuveer G, Hartz J, Lubans DR, Takken T, Wiltz JL, Mietus-Snyder M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness in youth: an important marker of health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142.
2. Al-Mallah MH, Sakr S, Al-Qunaibet A. Cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular disease prevention: an update. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20.
3. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després JP, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134.
4. Nordén KR, Dagfinrud H, Semb AG, Hisdal J, Metsios GS, Sexton J, et al. Criterion validity and responsiveness of estimated cardiorespiratory fitness models in patients with inflammatory joint disease. J Clin Med. 2023;12(21):6753. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216753
5. Houle SA, Sui X, Blair SN, Ross R. Association between change in nonexercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in men. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022;6(2):106–13.
6. Maranhão Neto G, Pedreiro R, Oliveira A, Machado S, Vieira L, Marques Neto S, et al. Prediction of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Brazilian population aged 20 to 59 years: a non-exercise model approach with self-reported variables. SciELO journals. Dataset. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20045570.v1
7. Schumacher BT, Di C, Bellettiere J, Lamonte MJ, Simonsick EM, Parada H, et al. Validation, Recalibration, and Predictive Accuracy of Published VO2maxPrediction Equations for Adults Ages 50-96 Yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55.
8. Liff MH, Hoff M, Fremo T, Wisløff U, Videm V. An estimation model for cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52:1248–55.
9. Neder JA, Phillips DB, Marillier M, Bernard AC, Berton DC, O’Donnell DE. Clinical interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing: current pitfalls and limitations. Front Physiol. 2021;12.
10. DeCato TW, Haverkamp H, Hegewald MJ, Sockrider M, Kaminsky D. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:P1–2.
11. Maranhao Neto GA, Alves I, Lattari E, Oliveira AJ, Machado S, Neto SM, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and non-exercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness among adults: evidences from a middle-income country. Public Health. 2020;189.
12. Wang Y, Chen S, Lavie CJ, Zhang J, Sui X. An overview of non-exercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness: estimation equations, cross-validation and application. J Sci Sport Exerc. 2019;1:38–53.
13. Peterman JE, Whaley MH, Harber MP, Fleenor BS, Imboden MT, Myers J, et al. Comparison of non-exercise cardiorespiratory fitness prediction equations in apparently healthy adults. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28:142–8.
14. Sloan RA, Scarzanella MV, Gando Y, Sawada SS. Accuracy of non-exercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in Japanese adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18.
15. Peterman JE, Harber MP, Imboden MT, Whaley MH, Fleenor BS, Myers J, et al. Accuracy of exercise-based equations for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53:74–82.
16. Hansen D, Niebauer J, Cornelissen V, Barna O, Neunhäuserer D, Stettler C, et al. Exercise prescription in patients with different combinations of cardiovascular disease risk factors: a consensus statement from the EXPERT working group. Sports Med. 2018;48.
17. Vásquez-Gómez J, De Carvalho RS, Faundez-Casanova C, Castillo-Retamal M, Castillo-Retamal F. A model to predict maximal oxygen uptake using vital signs and lifestyles in university students. Rev Med Chil. 2019;147.
18. Petroski ÉL. Antropometria: técnicas e padronizações. 5th ed. Florianópolis: Fontoura; 2011.
19. Rankin SL, Briffa TG, Morton AR, Hung J. A specific activity questionnaire to measure the functional capacity of cardiac patients. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1220–3.
20. Blair SN, Kannel WB, Kohl HW, Goodyear N, Wilson PWF. Surrogate measures of physical activity and physical fitness: evidence for sedentary traits of resting tachycardia, obesity, and low vital capacity. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:1145–56.
21. Carvalho T, Freitas OGA, Chalela WA, Hossri CAC, Milani M, Buglia S, Precoma DB, et al. Diretriz Brasileira de Ergometria em População Adulta – 2024. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024;121(3):e20240110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240110
22. Nes BM, Janszky I, Vatten LJ, Nilsen TIL, Aspenes ST, Wisløff U. Estimating VO₂peak from a nonexercise prediction model: the HUNT study, Norway. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:2024–30.
23. Jackson AS, Blair SN, Mahar MT, Wier LT, Ross RM, Stuteville JE. Prediction of functional aerobic capacity without exercise testing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22.
24. Duperly J, Serrato M, Forero NI, Jimenez-Mora MA, Mendivil CO, Lobelo F. Validation of maximal, submaximal, and nonexercise indirect VO₂max estimations at 2600 m altitude. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21.
25. Mailey EL, White SM, Wójcicki TR, Szabo AN, Kramer AF, McAuley E. Construct validation of a non-exercise measure of cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:59.
26. George JD, Stone WJ, Burkett LN. Non-exercise VO₂max estimation for physically active college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:415–23.
27. Heil DP, Freedson PS, Ahlquist LE, Price J, Rippe JM. Nonexercise regression models to estimate peak oxygen consumption. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27.
28. Whaley MH, Kaminsky LA, Dwyer GB, Getchell LH. Failure of predicted VO₂peak to discriminate physical fitness in epidemiological studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27.
29. Koley S, Singh J, Sandhu JS. Gender difference in aerobic capacity and the contribution by body composition and haemoglobin concentration: a study in young Indian national hockey players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(4):997–1002. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001554
30. Coyle EF, D’Souza A, Spragg J, et al. Determinants of maximal oxygen uptake in highly trained females and males: a mechanistic study of sex differences using advanced invasive methods. J Physiol. 2023;601(24):5407–23. doi:10.1113/JP284411
31. Bradshaw DI, George JD, Hyde A, LaMonte MJ, Vehrs PR, Hager RL, et al. An accurate VO₂max nonexercise regression model for 18–65-year-old adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76:426–32.
32. Conklin DJ, Schick S, Blaha MJ, Carll A, DeFilippis A, Ganz P, et al. Cardiovascular injury induced by tobacco products: assessment of risk factors and biomarkers of harm. A Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science compilation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;316.
33. Jurca R, Jackson AS, LaMonte MJ, Morrow JR, Blair SN, Wareham NJ, et al. Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29.
34. Neto GM, Pedreiro R, Oliveira A, Machado S, Vieira L, Neto SM, et al. Prediction of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Brazilian population aged 20 to 59 years: a non-exercise model approach with self-reported variables. J Phys Educ (Maringa). 2019;30.
35. Policarpo-Barbosa F, Fernandes-Filho J, Roquetti-Fernandes P, Irany-Knackfuss M. Mathematical model for epidemiologic survey of the cardiorespiratory fitness without effort test. Rev Salud Publica. 2008; 10.
36. Eldridge JA. Validation of a non-exercise model for the prediction of VO₂max in firefighters. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37.
37. Bradshaw DI, George JD, Hyde A, LaMonte MJ, Vehrs PR, Hager RL, et al. An accurate VO₂max nonexercise regression model for 18–65-year-old adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76:426–32.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Anderson Zampier Ulbrich, Juan Marcelo Simões Cáceres, Leonardo Felipe Ribeiro Araujo, Nicole Rampani Franzoni, Sara Batista Honorato, Renata Labronici Bertin, Kenny Regina Lehmann, Luis Henrique Gabira Perez
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ao publicar na Revista Contexto & Saúde, os autores concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os trabalhos seguem a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), que permite:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato;
Adaptar — remixar, transformar e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, inclusive comercial.
Essas permissões são irrevogáveis, desde que respeitados os seguintes termos:
Atribuição — os autores devem ser devidamente creditados, com link para a licença e indicação de eventuais alterações realizadas.
Sem restrições adicionais — não podem ser aplicadas condições legais ou tecnológicas que restrinjam o uso permitido pela licença.
Avisos:
A licença não se aplica a elementos em domínio público ou cobertos por exceções legais.
A licença não garante todos os direitos necessários para usos específicos (ex.: direitos de imagem, privacidade ou morais).
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões expressas nos artigos, que são de exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores. O Editor, com o apoio do Comitê Editorial, reserva-se o direito de sugerir ou solicitar modificações quando necessário.
Somente serão aceitos artigos científicos originais, com resultados de pesquisas de interesse que não tenham sido publicados nem submetidos simultaneamente a outro periódico com o mesmo objetivo.
A menção a marcas comerciais ou produtos específicos destina-se apenas à identificação, sem qualquer vínculo promocional por parte dos autores ou da revista.
Contrato de Licença (para artigos publicados a partir de setembro/2025): Os autores mantém os direitos autorais sobre seu artigo, e concedem à Revista Contexto & Saúde o direito de primeira publicação.
